(no subject)

[clockmaster]

I can't believe a virus want me to get laid.

EDIT Ic:

[Locked to Naoto because they're both Robot Geeks.]

The International Robot Festival is held in the Tokyo this days and I was thought...that maybe you would like to go?

[/Locked.]

Comments

|D lol

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

No I mean that thing that it's growing inside of you.

You can use Rachel as practice. Remember that if you want the kid to stop crying burning them is not an option.

Re: |D lol

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

Oh, that. Well, you should have said so; I had assumed you were talking about a real baby as opposed to the psychosomatic effects of a virus.

That would be pointless, wouldn't it? I'm not going to give birth now, and even when I do far, far in the future, there are servants for that sort of thing.

You didn't answer my question.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

oh, I'm surprised. You know the meaning of the word 'psychosomatic'.

I pity your son if you ever have one.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

I'm intelligent.

But you wouldn't pity a daughter?

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

You should try to show that to people more often.

'Son' as in general. Male or female.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

Funny; I do.

I've never heard it used that way. People generally just say "child".

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

Not really.

Your problem, not mine. Get smarter.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

Yes, really.

It's not a matter of intelligence. You weren't very clear at all.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

If that's what you think...

Sure.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

And now you're acting like a kid. What a surprise.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

Takes one to know one.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

That's even worse.

Are you still affected?

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

For you maybe.

Do you ever read the entry or just come here to complain like you always do?

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

I read the entry, which should be obvious from my first comment.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

In that case if I'm affected or not it should be obvious too.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

Not really. You could be reflecting back on past experience.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

It's because of comments like this that I told you to try to be smarter.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

There's nothing in your entry that indicates whether or not you're still affected. In fact, it's reminiscent of the sort of entry that people make when they've just lost the effects of a virus.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

I posted 'want' not 'wanted'. Therefore, I'm talking about the present. it's obvious.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

Not really. Even if it had worn off, it stands to reason that it's... intentions are still relevant.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

You are really dumb sometimes.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

Are you just saying that because you can't think of anything else to say except, "... oh no, she's right; I WASN'T very clear in my original post"?

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

No, I'm saying that because you are the only one who didn't understood the post. Proofs don't lie.

[peoplesprincess.livejournal.com]

And the post was one sentence long and quite unclear.

[clockmaster.livejournal.com]

For someone with you short intelligence? It clearly was. Not for the rest of people.